Viewing page 15 of 150

This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.

-13-

is probably sparked by recent publicity in the newspapers. Mr. Mahon explained that the procedure for such a request is done by a letter in which a request is made pointing out each issue to be looked at. This letter is signed by the subcommittee chairman and ranking minority member, as well as Chairman Mahon and Mr. Cederberg. The Appropriations Committee maintains an investigative staff of 30 to 50 investigators, who are highly professional and conduct an absolutely objective operation. Mr. Mahon will want to discuss the particular issues with the subcommittee members in an effort to make the best resolution of the problem, and he will be glad to cooperate and avoid any duplication of reviews as well as not take too much time of the Smithsonian staff members.

Senator Jackson offered to be available to the Appropriations Committee staff as well as to the chairman and ranking members so that there can be a free flow of comments and suggestions. Senator Jackson again stressed his expectation that the study to be undertaken is to be a thoroughly objective, scholarly review of the foundations of the Smithsonian and of its present place in the Federal Establishment. He expects the study to produce a first-rate analysis of the Institution's authorities, organization, and public and private relationships, and well-considered recommendations that will be helpful to both the Congress and the Smithsonian itself in defining ways to clarify the Institution's charter, and strengthen its accountability to the Congress.