Viewing page 85 of 150

This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.

-83-

As more has become known about objects, their physical and chemical structure and their manufacture, there has been an attendant increase in the sophistication of forgers who either produce outright imitations or, what is more threatening, alter ancient objects or combine them to create those unique specimens attractive to eager collectors and, sometimes, to unsuspecting professionals.

The research approaches that constitute archaeometry are major defenses against these hazards, as well as major tools for more precise dating and more profound understanding of the evolution of technology, trade routes, and civilization itself. 

Dr. Gell-Mann stated that although the Smithsonian does have conservation facilities that carry out excellent work (mostly in conservation itself and some in archaeometry) he feels that a good deal more could be accomplished at the Smithsonian that would be invaluable for its collections.

Mr. Ripley greatly welcomed this initiative on the part of the Regents and expressed his appreciation for his staff as well as himself for this policy guidance.

The Board of Regents approved the following motion:

VOTED that in consideration of the unique opportunity that the collections of the Institution present, and of the excellence and variety of its scholarly staff, the Regents urge that the Institution, and especially its Conservation Analytical Laboratory, develop, as a matter of priority, the facilities, staff, and programs necessary to further archaeometric research within the Institution and in cooperation with other organizations as may be found desirable.