Viewing page 6 of 164

This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.

- iii -

continued facility and program development of the National Museum of the American Indian also receives major emphasis in the next five-year plan.

The Smithsonian faces uncertain times with regard to future funding growth as the government deals with budget balancing problems, as competition for donor and private funds increases and as general economic climate continues to undulate.  The resource projections in the Prospectus reflect this uncertainty.

Funding Goals
Fiscal Years 1993 - 1997
(Millions of Dollars)

[[6 columned table]]
|   | FY 93 | FY 94 | FY 95 | FY96 | FY 97 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| OPERATING FUNDS: |   |   |   |   |   |
| Federal Salaries and Expenses | $377 | $408 | $434 | $465 | $483 |
| Trust Funds /1 | 271 | 291 | 305 | 319 | 332 |
| Government Grants and Contracts | 38 | 39 | 37 | 38 | 38 |
| Total Operating Funds | $686 | $738 | $776 | $822 | $853 |
| Repair and Restoration /2 | $37 | $37 | $39 | $37 | $39 |
| Smithsonian Construction /3 | 80 | 144 | 78 | 75 | 68 |
| Zoo Construction and Improvements | 16 | 22 | 18 | 13 | 20 |
| TOTAL FUNDING /4 | $819 | $941 | $911 | $947 | $980 |
[[/table]]

/1  Reflects gross income including cost of operations.

/2  Reflects Federal appropriation for Repair, Restoration and Code Compliance, and Major Capital  Renewal.

/3  Reflects Federal appropriations for Construction, Alterations and Modifications, and Construction Planning.  The Institution plans to supplement certain construction projects with nonappropriated funds.

/4  The Institution will revise projections based on:  effects of Congressional action on the fiscal year 1992 pending budget request; any budget-reducing sequester; further information from OMB on economic and pay assumptions for the planning period; and further Institutional review of projections as submitted by Smithsonian organizations.

REVISED GUIDELINES FOR CORPORATE NAMING

Management reaffirmed the longstanding position of the Regents that the naming of any Smithsonian facility shall be a matter for the Board's action.  Guidelines were offered simply as a contextual aid to the Regents when they are asked to consider a proposal to name a facility in recognition of a corporate donation.

VOTED that the Board of Regents endorses the revised guidelines for its consideration of proposals to name Smithsonian facilities of significant corporate support.