![Transcription Center logo](/themes/custom/tc_theme/assets/image/logo.png)
This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.
Table 1 Continued [[3 columned table]] | Topic | Issue | Response | | --- | --- | --- | | KSC Runway Shoulders | Unsafe if Orbiter leaves runway | Rescue modes defined including water case. Fifty foot stabilized shoulders are present | | | Does not meet Air Force class B spec (1000 foot unobstructed) | Hazard not considered credible | | | | KSC design not required to meet AF specification does meet intent for missed runway landings. | | Energy Tolerance | EAFB offers more options | System design and demonstrated capability eliminate concern | | Brakes Failures | Significant damage occurs at less than rated energy | Consider downrating energy available in Flight Rules - issue in work, testing in work | | | Reduced confidence due to large number of failures/damage | Never have failed to stop Orbiter | | Wheel Lockup | Blown tire could result in directional control problems | Direction control still available (differential braking and NWS), no cases identified which result in high speed lockup | | Braking Procedures | Numerous complex and difficult to train because they [they] violate instinctive reactions and there is no high fidelity training device in the program | Complexity required to protect total braking capability | -B8-