Viewing page 110 of 204

This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.

• level II depends on projects to bring safety items to them...e.g. level III 17" disconnects

[Arnie....suggestions on how safety should bubble problems up to level II?] at MSFC, any safety non-conformances are handled w/in proj. office and R&QA//safety is under engineering (Kingsbury)

MERRELL (on CIL)

• "functional" vs "hardware" criticality

• level 1 had to provide CCB signature to approve crit 1, IR ...delegated to level 2 in FEB 84

• FRR, other reports involving crit 1 items, should (but don't) elicit safety office concern/attention .... at least they should flag to FRR participants that prob. is crit 1

• level 3 FRR at MSFC. (Look at

Transcription Notes:
second paragraph has double brackets in original text