Viewing page 15 of 17

This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.

prototype has progressed to a point where a sensible evaluation of the plane's technical and economic prospects becomes possible, then the parties at interest will be in a much better position to decide how best to move to the production plane.

There are many good reasons for starting off on this project with a prototype. The case for this approach is well set forth in a study done by the Rand Corporation for the Air Force, to which Mr. Tipton, of the Air Transport Association, will refer during the course of his testimony. I believe, quite strongly, that the design, construction and testing of a prototype is the starting method for this program, and that any other approach will almost certainly waste time and money. We will be on a sounder foundation if the prototype is first developed and tested. And we may escape crushing disappointments on the way.

The Need for a Superior Airplane

The details of the design I prefer to leave to our engineers, some of whom will be testifying before this committee.  However, with regard to the broad requirements that be imposed upon the designer, I would like to make one general recommendation.  It is that the U.S. should not content itself merely with duplicating the British-French supersonic machine.  Our fundamental objective should be to reach for a  plane that will be substantially superior to the European one in all respects. It should be safer if possible, at least as fast, and it should have a growth potential beyond its initial speed. In all important categories, technical and economic, it should be superior.

I thank you for your interest and patience. The matter you are considering is of great importance to the country. I believe that we should go ahead with the plane and make certain that the job is well done.

14