![Transcription Center logo](/themes/custom/tc_theme/assets/image/logo.png)
This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.
(10) Penny: you structure your points, but time construction presented this effectively. Scheck: difference in average & excellent lawyers. Questions from audience a) What was outcome? Carrigan: the case was decided. Jury 2nd degree; reversed. 2nd trial- pled guilty for manslaughter. b) this was teaching tool- could it be used in a course (via videotape) in Law School. Carrigan: public needs to know more about the Law - not just law students. c) If pleaded guilty to manslaughter, why not on trial for perjury? Carrigan: No. Carrigan: described Scheck's case This week of clearing mistaken identity Cooper: Asked to come because trial law is considered a talk art. d) no one asked the Jury Juror:) - end -