Viewing page 41 of 44

This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.

6

now or later. Please leave that uninformative pseudo-scholarly conceit to your propounded "Greenbergers" for the time being and later, .... 
It is my "dream" that someday the inaccurate epithet "minimal" will be applied to art as engaging as that misrepresented by the term "cubist" (but, please not like that of the Russian "rayonist"). If the Greenburg burdened critical hierarchy really cared to support a somewhat accurate "quickie" appellation, they could choose the "maximal" initially issued by the steadily "emerging" political "philosophe" of the "movement", Don Judd (I know him as jus' plan Donald Clarence but, after all, that's not mythically sufficient.) but, of course, then they would be cheated of their clinically tittilating little "put down". 
In "some other comments...", I did not write "sound-light-motion promotions"; I did write "'sound, light, motion' critical-curatorial promotions." Your "editorial" omission is curious or, actually, maybe, not so curious from your position.
Frankly, I couldn't give the figurative painting of Philipe Pearlstein, Lennart Anderson, Jack Beal and Alex Katz any contemporary credence.
Let Sidney go on waiting for his abstract critical "crisis" but, possibly, he shouldn't write about it or anything else. Remember, "Give It Up, Sidney!"