![Transcription Center logo](/themes/custom/tc_theme/assets/image/logo.png)
This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.
(6) Judd is indifferent to the "character" of his objects. This indifference results in an indeterminate attitude toward the unknown proportions of individual sequences. The coded blocks remain ambiguous by being contained within the twin "odds" and "evens" of abstract-sets [[strikethrough]] [[?]] [[/strikethrough]]. The mathematical probability may be denied by the physical structure of the object in question. But [[strikethrough]] this [[/strikethrough]] such a question like becomes a psuedo-question like, "Is the physical matter unthinkable as a specific object?" This approach is dangerous and should not be confused with other [[strikethrough]] more [[?]] [[/strikethrough]] types of entropic thinking. [[strikethrough]] about objects [[/strikethrough]] It is important to [[strikethrough]] emph [[/strikethrough]] place emphasis on the coloration [[strikethrough]] of [[/strikethrough]] as a random choice, but not in regard to the over all structure of the regression as an abstraction. Together with the objects capascity for storing non-determinate analogs or meta-ideas, exists a condition of negative communication. This is important.