Viewing page 4 of 114

Cyanerpes, Nov. 3, 1957, IV. 4

species (i.e. the Wh-BU complex) looks as if it might turn out to be not unlike A&H's description of [[underline]] Emberiza [[/underline]]!
Now I just saw a nice case of the complete Wh & BU & Wing-quivering (Qu) performance of the ♂, when the ♀ landed beside him. Very fluffed underneath Tail raised obliquely, quite high. Only momentary 

about as low as the wing ever got → [[image - pencil bird drawing]]
            
Cyanerpes, I November 4, 1957 Barro Colorado

I may have to modify my previous description of the CN a little. It is not always harsh. Sometimes, perhaps usually, quite clear. Almost always loud. Increases in frequency when the birds move about more. But always really single notes ― so far.
I rather think that the clearer CN's contain a stronger escape element than the harsher ones. What one would expect I suppose.
During a dispute this morning, I saw the ♀ adopt a brief and not extreme BU with definite CR. This is the first time I have been sure of this last component in her case. Looked just like the ♂'s CR. There is no doubt, however, but that
Please note that the language and terminology used in this collection reflects the context and culture of the time of its creation, and may include culturally sensitive information. As an historical document, its contents may be at odds with contemporary views and terminology. The information within this collection does not reflect the views of the Smithsonian Institution, but is available in its original form to facilitate research. For questions or comments regarding sensitive content, access, and use related to this collection, please contact transcribe@si.edu.