Viewing page 62 of 93

This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.

hand that such claims of arguments so absolutely without foundation simply diminished any good opinion I might have entertained about our antagonists.
[[ 118 in pencil in margin]]
They say their position is the following:
Our patents are involved in view of prior art. and if they are valid then they can demonstrate that they do not infringe them.  I told them our standpoint was just the contrary.  They repeated how much time and money was going to be wasted mainly to the advantage of their parties
[[end page]]
[[start page]]
119
who were anxiously waiting to jump in after they had benefited by any disclosures and how we both wish our parties could keep them all out if we kept our patents unassailed etc.
Finally we argued to try to arrange a meeting between [[red underline]] Dyer, Brown [[/red underline]] and [[red underline]] Aylesworth [[/red underline]] and [[red underline]] Townsend Brickenstein [[/red underline]] and myself.  Where each side would present their arguments in concise form after which we would consider some kind of a arrangement.  I told them such arrangement ought to be such as to dispose of all further differences of opinion or suppress future suits, ought to include
[[end page]]