Viewing page 53 of 100

This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.

100
My [[underlined]] apprehensions as to their tricks were fully justified. [[/underlined]]
[[strikethrough]] Afterwa [[/strikethrough]] Second conference with [[underlined]] Potter [[/underlined]] who has read now our proposal carefully and [[underlined]] finds it acceptable [[/underlined]] except in some details which can be revised. [[underlined]] Very frank and open discussion 
April 30. [[/underlined]] All day with Redman and [[underlined]] Potter. [[/underlined]] further discussions of details.
[[strikethrough]] April [[/strikethrough]] [[underlined]] May 1, 1926. [[/underlined]] Further discussion. Potter, Redman Geo B. and myself as to [[underlined]] Bye-laws, directors [[/underlined]] etc.
[[underlined]] May 2 [[/underlined]] (Sunday) Here all Sunday. busy day.
[[underlined]] May 3 [[/underlined]] All morning at office. Afternoon 4-6 P.M lecture in [[underlined]] Columbia. Subject Some [[strikethrough]] reasons of [[/strikethrough]] causes of [[/underlined]]
[[end page]]
[[start page]]
101
[[underlined]] Success and [[Insuccess?]] [[/underlined]] in the career of Chemists." [[/underlined]]
[[strikethrough]] May 3 [[/strikethrough]] Our butler [[underlined]] Gorgelson [[/underlined]] and his wife left for Norway. This is the first day since I am back that I do not need my overcoat, altho' still using winter clothes and ditto underwear. A cold slow spring.
[[underlined]] May 4. Neave & Townsend [[/underlined]] came to urge me to sign license for [[underlined]] Durez. [[/underlined]] Showed them the absurdity of their advice. [[underlined]] Neave treats the matter rather casually [[/underlined]] He of course does not worry much about how it would injure our company. In fact he looks at it entirely from the narrow patent. license standpoint [[underlined]] glad perhaps that if we are giving licenses we might give one to General Electric Company. [[/underlined]] [[strikethrough]] Glad also p [[/strikethrough]] Desires also 

Transcription Notes:
I use past tense 'underlined' with a 'd' because that is my understanding from the instructions. It seems a waste of time to edit just to remove the 'd' in 'underlined'. If I review and the transcriber just uses 'underline' I do not add the 'd' Sounds sensible to me.