![Transcription Center logo](/themes/custom/tc_theme/assets/image/logo.png)
This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.
[[preprinted]] 198 [[/preprinted]] My 18, '97 alpha Cor. Aust. 5764 1 [[superscript]] 4 [[/superscript]] This identified as gamma Cor. Aust. { Like zeta Tucanae. H lines strong and hazy. H delta very wide and hazy. alpha is type A. [[strikethrough]] b Velorum [[/strikethrough]] C [[subscript]] 1 [[/subscript]] Scorpii 4421 1 [[superscript]] 5 [[/superscript]] This star resembles delta Can. Maj. The H & K lines are however [[strikethrough]] iota Scorpii [[/strikethrough]] much narrower. They are about 1/2 as wide as in delta Can. Maj. The violet end may not be alike either. The H lines are much stronger and it is probably under a sharp-lined star of an earlier division. A.G.C. 24218 on plate 4421 very poor. Under gamma Crucis most probably. [[end page]] [[start page]] [[preprinted]] 199 [[/preprinted]] [[underline]] May 19, '97 [[/underline]] alpha Fornacis 8190 2 [[superscript]] 3 [[/superscript]] Like beta Hydri except that H lines are slightly stronger. Lines are not as sharp in thos two-prism plate of alpha Fornacis, nor in 7719 beta Hydri. alpha Fornacis 7716 1 [[superscript]] 5 [[/superscript]] This greatly resembles beta Hydri 5932. H is slightly narrower than in beta. H lines slightly stronger, especially H gamma than in beta. 4326.0 is weaker than in beta. Here H gamma = 4 [[strikethrough]] 1 [[/strikethrough]] 4326.0 in beta Hydri = 2 x 4326.0 This star can not go under alpha Aurigae, while beta Hyd. may. alpha Fornacis 4433 1 [[superscript]] 2 [[/superscript]] poor alpha Fornacis 4508 1 [[superscript]] 2 [[/superscript]] Compared with alpha Aurigae, the differences consist mostly in the strength of the H lines and 4326.0 as above compared wirh beta Hydri. alpha Fornacis is nearer like zeta Tucanae. Lines seem sharper in alpha Fornacis than in zeta Tuc.