
This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.
[[preprinted]] 132 [[/preprinted]] [[underline]] April 6, '97 [[underline]] chi 7725 2 [[superscript]] 4 [[/superscript]] { chi 7805 2 [[superscript]] 4 [[/superscript]] {as compared with 7849 alpha Phoen. H lines of nearly same intensity lambda 4227 little stronger in alpha. A little more absorption in violet in beta, which seems to be due to the quality of the plate rather than to the star. This versus the judgment of the preceding page and puts beta Phoen. under alpha Bootis. 5398 1 [[superscript]] 5 [[/superscript]] (best plate) H beta [[insert]] slightly [[/insert]] stronger than in alpha Bootis 4333 1 [[superscript]] ? [[/superscript]] 6890 1 [[superscript]] 4 [[/superscript]] 5957 1 [[superscript]] 3 [[/superscript]] H lines on this plate appear stronger than in alpha Bootis 4535 1 [[superscript]] ? [[/superscript]] 6903 1 [[superscript]] 5 [[/superscript]] Shows a decided approach to preceding group. Under alpha Bootis A.G.C. 965 too poor in 5957 & 5398. On 453 [[strikethrough]] 8 [[/strikethrough]] 5 and 6903 faintly seen. [[end page]] [[start page]] [[preprinted]] 133 [[/preprinted]] April 6, 97 beta Corvi chi Eridani 5705 1 [[superscript]] 4 [[/superscript]] 7248 1 [[superscript]] 4 [[/superscript]] Like alpha Aurigae in having little absorption twr. violet. 4473 1 [[superscript]] 2 [[/superscript]]