![Transcription Center logo](/themes/custom/tc_theme/assets/image/logo.png)
This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.
[[preprinted]] 86 [[/preprinted]] Feb. 11, '97 Under alpha Aurigae mu [[subscript]] 1 [[/subscript]] Grucis X 6951 X 5005 Under beta Corvi mu [[subscript]] 2 [[/subscript]] Grucis X 6959, X 5005 Mch. 14. These are poor spectra but nearer like alpha Bootis iota Grucis X 4443 { 5391 { 7770 (two prisms){ Under delta Can. Maj. chi Sag. X 7057 Find X7960 & 7961. [[end page]] [[start page]] [[preprinted]] 87 [[/preprinted]] [[underline]] Feb. 12, '97 [[/underline]] Under beta Corvi delta Grucis X 4345 X 5986 This plate shows marked absorption in violet. theta Centauri 4128 7491 (two prisms) strongly approaching alpha Bootis, perhaps should be in same group but line 4221 does not seem quite strong enough and F line as too distinct. Where is 7648? Feb. 27. chi 7648 found and alone would put the star under epsilon Tri. Aust. Why the discordance? I find that chi 7542 alpha Triang. Aust. was in cover of chi 7648. See. p. 104 for further discussion of theta Cent. mu Vel. X 6281 1 [[superscript]] 3 [[/superscript]] X 3959 1 [[superscript]] 5 [[/superscript]] X 5439 1 [[superscript]] 4 [[/superscript]] Like alpha Aurigae ? Look up plate 7538 and 6435. Apr. 2 X 6435 1 [[superscript]] 4 [[/superscript]] These plates show H lines of greater intensity than following group while lambda 4227 is nearly as strong and shading as prev. [[??]]. This star was recently found. The a double with a companion of about 13th mag. purplish in color. Could this have any affect? ksi Hydrae 4037 5641 gamma Lupi chi 5666 X 4738 { [[strikethrough]] perhaps [[/strikethrough]] slightly approaching alpha Bootis