Viewing page 35 of 111

This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.

[[preprinted]]66[[/preprinted]]
Feb, 13, 1907
Cont. of preceding
30. On positive, not on negative
  [[image]]

31. Brighter on positive

32 On positive, not on negative
May be a defect

33 Brighter on negative. Positive may be defective at this point.
Comparing AC 5624 & 4406, directly, no difference is seen in this star. 

34. On negative, may be a defect. 

35. Bright on positive, Defect.

36. Bright on positive, not on negative. This is evidently a star and not a defect.
Known
J Andromedae
[[end page]]

[[new page]]
[[preprinted]]67[[/preprinted]]

Feb, 13, 1907
Cont. of preceding

[[strike-through]] 37. On negative, precedes a star of equal brightness
Defect. It rubbed off. [[/strikethrough]]

37. A faint star, perhaps slightly fainter on positive

38. Bright on [[strikethrough]] positive [[/strikethrough]] negative , not on positive. 
Nothing on AC 8056, 
A defect nearly the shape of the stars. Nothing on AC 4440 taken Dec. 26, 1903 The plate on which this appears was taken Dec. 19. 1903.

39. On negative, not on positive. 

40 On positive. Not on negative
Defect.

41. Faint star on negative, not on positive.
Not on AC 157, AC 5795, AC 8056, 
Probably a defect.

42. Bright on negative, nothing on positive. 
Approx, position (1855) 0 42 + 34 50
Known. V Andromedae

43. On negative. Defect

Transcription Notes:
(36) This looks more like J Andromedae than iota. Could also be Upsilon. (37 - strikethrough) Hrrubbed? The horizontal line in t is unusually offset. (42) Again, more like V than nu.