This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.
[preprinted]74[/preprinted] Feb. 19, 1909 16. A little brighter in position 17. Certainly brighter on positive. No variation on AC 4986, 5227, 1730, 4923, 6876. 1436. Original negative AM 1918 is probably defective. Examined by M.P.A. who thinks the increased brightness is due to a defect over the star. 18. Very bright on negative, not on positive Certainly a star Known. Z Ophiuchi 19. on edge of position Brighter in position Appears to be possibly slightly variable, but too near edge to be sure. On AM 3749, 3889, where the star comes nearer centre, no change seen! 20. Brighter in position Defect[?] Faint star,[?] [[image]] 21. Certainly brighter on positive AM 2796, 2767, 2619, 1051, + 1436 show no change in this object 22. Faint object appears to be higher [in?] position [end page] [start page] [[preprinted]] 75 [[/preprinted]] Feb. 19, 1907 Cont. of preceding 23. [[strikethrough]] F [[/strikethrough]] Upper of a darker star appears fainter on negative Probably due to different densities 24. Brighter on positive Probably due to densities 25. Brighter on pos not confirmed 26. Faint object on positive, not on neg Defect on AM 1918 27. Faint object on positive not on neg. This looks like a star and is certainly missing or very faint on the negative. Probably too faint to appear on this negative. 28. Two stars, the upper one of which looks brighter on pos. very poor images on neg. 29. On negative, not on positive. Defect? Defect 30. Brighter on positive AM 2767, 2796, 2573 No change 31. On positive, not on negative. Defect on AM 1918 from which positive was made.