Viewing page 28 of 108

This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.

[[preprinted]]52[[/preprinted]]

[[underline]]May 29, 1907[[underline]]
6^[[h]]-30[[symbol - degrees]]
Identification of objects matched while company AM718 with D = AM3857

(1) Bright on positive Probably due to defect since the star does not seem brighter on AM3857
[[diagram]]

(2) Slight difference in intensities of these two starts
v? seems brighter on AM 1912 than on AM2375.
[[diagram]]

(3) This star is brighter on positive
Serial plates compared but in great change [[?]]
It seems fainter on AM2448 than on AM2294.
[[diagram]]

4. Brighter on positive
Same object as on 1837
7^[[h]]0 - 25
[[margin note]]Var. No. 20..[[/margin note]]

[[end page]]

[[begin page]]

[[preprinted]]53[[/preprinted]]

[[underline]]June 4, 1907[[underline]]
Cont. of preceding

5. Brighter on positive, also on AM 3857from which the positive was made.
[[diagram]]
Faint on Am718, Am 1837
I am not sure whether this is real 
It must be confirmed on B plates
Rough, Approx. 5^[[h]] 20^[[m]] - 2930
[[margin note]][[?]][[margin note]]
[[strikethrough]The [[?]] appears defective on AM3284 which may [[?]] for the apparent [[?]].[[/strikethrough]]
^[[Normal on B2971 1158. Faint on 1068? and on 85 Bright on AM 3182. I think this is variable in small  [[?]].
6. Very bright on positive, absent on negative
This is R Columbae
7. Bright on positive, absent on negative
This is S Columbae
8. Brighter on positive. Image on negative may be defective.
Bright on AM 2294 1837, 1722, 3065 3048, 3284, 1068, 1558, 3182, 1110, 3147
Image doubtful and certainly defective on AM718.
[[margin note, lower LH]]Also br. on 2364, 2448, 2375, 731, 3168,[[/margin note]]