Viewing page 108 of 223

This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.

145.)

2.7.50, cont.  Coan, Glen of Imaal, WI. cont.
 
Taken at 1.  By the Little Slaney, Ca.  1000 ft. alt. 12 noon - 1.0 P.M.
[29 mtd. & these labelled 25.12.1960.] 

Crabro palmipes ♂︎ taken: seen in hundreds during sun burst on alder, &.c possibly also included C. varius.
Rhogogaster viridis ♂︎♂︎ on alder.
Tenthredo coquebertia 2♂︎♂︎.
Dryinid ♂︎ = 
Cryptinids 2, including Pezomachus fasciatus? ♀︎, ant. 20: small.

Glypta ceratites ♀︎: not mtd.
Zootrephus suspiciosus  red ♀︎: not mtd.
Cteniscus 1 ant. 31.
Alexeter cf. fallax? ♀︎, ant. 47.
Hadrodactylus cf. typhae? ♀︎, ant. 45.
Campoplegids 5, mostly Meloboris sp. black coxae: none mtd.

Bracon fulvipes 1♂︎, 1 very red ♀︎;  ant. 40(♂︎) & 36(♀︎).
Onocophanes minutus ♀︎, ant. 22.
Apanteles fulvipes group 2 ♂︎♂︎: not mtd.
Euphorus cf. pallipes  1(♀︎?), ant. 23.
E. sp. near last, but smaller & frons smooth & polished.
Proctos 2:  1 mtd. = 
Also 2 other Diptera =
9 Tachinids:  black wings:  It was intended to send these to Dr. Day, but I never sent them! AWS.
Coccinellid  1


146.)

Coan, WI., cont.

2.7.50.  Taken by M.W.R. de V. Graham at 1 & 2 - mostly at 2! (not separated!)

Dryinids 2♂︎♂︎.
Phaeogenines. 2♀︎♀︎.
Cryptines 2♂︎♂︎.
Glypta elongata 1 very red ♂︎.     
Stenomacrus laricis 2♀︎♀︎ & S. sp.? 1♂︎.
Cteniscus ♂︎.
Campoplegids  1♂︎, 2♀︎♀︎.
Bracon tornator? large ♀︎, ant. broken!  Apanteles sp. ♂︎, black.
Sigalphus cf. pallipes  3♀︎♀︎.
Euphorus pallipes? 1.       
E.  1, small sp.
Diospilus capito  2♀︎♀︎.
Opius  2♀︎♀︎ = 
Aspilota cf. nigrescens ♂︎, small, very black legs.
Dacnusa diremta & areolaris 1 each.
Trioxys centaureae 1♀︎, large & dark.
Sawflies

Taken at 2 (by AWS.)  Birch plantation, Coan.  2.0 till 3.20 P.M. 
[22 mtd. & these labelled 26.12.60.]

Dryinid  ♂︎: not mtd.
Eriocampa ovata  ♀︎ on alder
Tenthredopsis  ♂︎, very red abdomen! = T. nassata?

Transcription Notes:
♂︎♀︎ Changed "ant." to "amt." 2) Changed back!!!! "ant." is an abbreviation for antennae - he is measuring the number of segments of the antennae, not the "amt". Also, there is no need to denote [[underlined]] or *[[]] inserted text. If you are going to correct someone's work then read the instructions & get it right!