Viewing page 6 of 107

This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.

8
Sat. June 13, 1914

[Cont] at the limit of visibility was examined. Of the Eighth satellite is in the region examined, it must be f? than the sixth satellite by more than a magnitude. The apparent difference in magnitude before satellite VI? and images at the limit of visibility in the region examined is more than two magnitudes. The region is at each a distance from the centre of the plate that the fainter stars are probably lost. 
Plate A 3655, June 26, Exp 30^m and 3658 June 27, Exp 30 
none superposed and the same region examined on Plate 3654 and 3657 was looked at, with negative results on these plates, the sixth satellite is somewhat none than a magnitude brighter than the limit of visibility of stars near the centre. 
Plate A 3554, May 30, Exp. 180^m and A 3556 May 31, Exp 90^m 
A region about 30' in diameter was examined on the above plates. The region is near the edge, and it is doubtful if stars as faint as the fifteenth magnitude are seen, even on A3554. 

9
Sat. June 13 [[strikethrough]]7[[/strikethrough]], 1914

Plate A 3666, June 30, Exp 124^m, is broken and was not found this afternoon. It would be similarly superposed on A 3669, Exp 120^m, July 1, 1899. 
Plate A 3550, May 29, 1899, Exp 158^m has been broken and mended on a glass plate. Superposed on A3554, May 30, Exp 180^m, mentioned above. Very near edge of plate, No faint stars seen. Results negative.

Plate A3669, July 1, 120^m superposed on A 365[[strikethrough]]6[[/strikethrough]]7 June 27, 174^m (see p. 7)
Near edge. Results negative