Viewing page 25 of 28

This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.

REPORT OF THE ATTORNEYS.
[[line]]


OMAHA, July 13, 1880
[[italics]]To Omaha Ponca Indian Committee:[[/italics]]
In response to the inquiry of one of your members, as to the condition of the suits instituted by us to liberate Standing Bear and his associates from the custody of the military, and to recover possession of the Ponca reservation, we make the following statement:

On April 8th, 1879, was filed by us the petition in the case of United States [[italics]]ex rel.[[/italics]] Ma-chu-nah-zha (Standing Bear) [[italics]] et al.[[/italics]] vs. George Crook, a Brigadier General of the Army of the United States and Commander of the Department of the Platte, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska, for a writ of [[italics]]habeas corpus[[/italics]] for the release of Standing Bear and his companions. This cause was tried about the first of May, 1879, and Standing Bear and his companions were restored to their liberty.  Thereupon the U.S. District Attorney took the case to the United States Circuit Court for this District, by appeal, and about May 19th, upon hearing before Mr. Justice Miller, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States, was there continued, and on January 5th, 1880, the appeal was dismissed on the motion of the U.S. District Attorney.

On April 3d, 1880, was commenced by us the case of Ponca Tribe of Indians vs. Makh-pi-ah-lu-ta, or Red Cloud, in his own behalf, and in behalf of the Sioux Nation of Indians, in the U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska, and on May 18th, 1880, we commenced, in the same Court, the case of "Ponca Tribe of Indians vs. Sioux Nation of Indians."  These cases were commenced, and are being prosecuted by us, to recover possession of, and establish the title of the Ponca tribe of Indians to so much of their old reservation as lies within the limits of Nebraska.  Great delay was made necessary in the commencement of these cases, and the ones subsequently commenced in Dakota, of which we below make mention, owing to difficulties in getting service of summons upon the defendants.  On May 22d, 1880, service of summons was had on the defendants in both cases, and some action will be taken therein at the next term of the Court.

About the 20th of May,1880, there were commenced, in Dakota, other suits in the name of the Ponca Tribe of Indians, and against the Sioux Nation of Indians, and against certain of their Chiefs, to settle and establish the title of the Ponca Tribe of Indians to so much of their old reservation as lies within the limits of Dakota.  Service has been had in these cases, and the several suits mentioned will be prosecuted by us with all convenient speed.

[[end page]]
[[start page]]

7

We might add that we also have in charge the case of John Elk vs. Charles Wilkins, in the U.S. Circuit Court, for this District, which is being prosecuted by us to determine the rights of Indians under the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States.

Respectfully submitted,
A.J. POPPLETON,
JNO. L. WEBSTER,