Viewing page 118 of 130

This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.

OMI review (4/26) (Michelle carried crew comments)
1. E to E test being rewritten, including an initial switch config.
2. The SSP functions not checked in E to E are caught with SSP/ERBS simulators
3. Sep timer checked in E to E (not IVT)
4. E to E and Mission seq will not be combined (E to E at CITE and PAD; Mission seq only CITE)
5. cmd path switch not really req'd (rf knocks out hardline commands - if there's carrier lock, you can't cmd hardline [?check this]
6. Will perform TDRS direct test (CITE and PAD)
----------------
[[left margin]]EVA/PMS[[/left margin]]
[[left margin]]NOT req'd[[/left margin]]
1. Operate with MPM's rolled in (to aid in XLATION along port longeron)[OK with GARY POLLACK - FLT TECH?]
2. have narrow [[angle symbol]] camera on ELBOW (lk detection in case of wrist camera fail)

Transcription Notes:
Symbol at #2 on bottom means "angle."