This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.
OMI review (4/26) (Michelle carried crew comments) 1. E to E test being rewritten, including an initial switch config. 2. The SSP functions not checked in E to E are caught with SSP/ERBS simulators 3. Sep timer checked in E to E (not IVT) 4. E to E and Mission seq will not be combined (E to E at CITE and PAD; Mission seq only CITE) 5. cmd path switch not really req'd (rf knocks out hardline commands - if there's carrier lock, you can't cmd hardline [?check this] 6. Will perform TDRS direct test (CITE and PAD) ---------------- [[left margin]]EVA/PMS[[/left margin]] [[left margin]]NOT req'd[[/left margin]] 1. Operate with MPM's rolled in (to aid in XLATION along port longeron)[OK with GARY POLLACK - FLT TECH?] 2. have narrow [[angle symbol]] camera on ELBOW (lk detection in case of wrist camera fail)
Transcription Notes:
Symbol at #2 on bottom means "angle."