Viewing page 67 of 250

This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.

Markings (1) - PLAID. IECM will be examined as part of Bob Kain's "Elbow camera" FOR (STS-2, -3 bays will be modelled);  [[Aikenhead?]] wants DAC fields of view for STS-2, -3 .... nothing official happening yet. 

Markings (4). The PLAID FOR is in, but not scheduled yet. 

Markings (5). (a) [[Scobee?]] + [[Omiguka?]] took pictures of the SMM on the paid. [[Therefore-using a calculus signal for this word]], we have picture documenting the markings. (b) FOR 216, not yet firmly scheduled, is in this mill to look at [[?]] markings, + whether operation can use cameras to judge whether latches are closed (SMM people want to avoid [[?]] + feedback...)

Markings (6). (a) DAC information has been passed on to Bob [[Nute?]] + the flight planners. (b) Wheelwright has done analysis of sunlight (on orbit) shining in the windows (aft or overhead) - can he do the same for the CCTV cameras? The DAC? (i.e. will light ever shine directly in + [[?]] 1 camera or 2 ops)
(c) Wheelwright should repeat the "study" of blooming resulting from sun light shining on reflective material mean grapple fixture, with flight cameras. 

[[PDRSO?]] should take action to get E+D to do this.  

Transcription Notes:
Bullet points not added. In Markings (5)(a), she uses a symbol for therefore, a pyramid of three dots, after paid. Noted in transcription but should be looked at.