This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.
36 5/13 Malfunction working group/CIL presentation [JSC] (schedule Thompson, Cohen presentation in late summer) •coarse/vernier switch is labelled •qual model MCIU was subjected to "qual level" tests, though not the certification tests themselves, before RPAT -> •backup PL release switch should be guarded ✓- SES model (Legendre) - we should attach the math model, developed by math model working group (not the CAE program specs - where problems were identified formally). This can by "xeroxed" by Liz Baines, Charlie Gott, etc., or officially handed over by Jon Brown. ✓- SMS: give notes, & some history, to Jim Saultz (he may be "appointed" by Kranz to head an effort RPAT - DR to fix consistency check will be implemented by IBM. Time required - 2 1/2 wks + 1 wk on rig (to test). Agreement: IBM will code, get rig 1st week of June, & malfunction portion of testing can continue until 6/20/80 (MCIU can stay til then) • reliability of switches? RI has checked theirs. SPAR lists theirs as low (?) probability. Is this consistent?