![Transcription Center logo](/themes/custom/tc_theme/assets/image/logo.png)
This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.
26 FEB Mulloy & Hardy first (Hardy was SRB proj. mgr before Mulloy) - 837 cut 1's [18 on SRM] Mulloy: LCC=31° Mulloy said SIL joint was 1R (!) ✓ Concern: items that are criticality 1 are reviewed & signed off at highest levels. Concern-if at/on day before launch, engineers at MSFC can decide to re-interpret that criticality & waive • does he think there should be a LCC on seal temperate - yes...no data (how did you judge he was OK?) ✓Eng...arguments didn't hang together. they admitted inconclusive they were reusing data - didn't have proof that it would work at 31° Do you believe you had data that should it was safe HARDY - Ben Powers expressed concerns to his suspicion (Hardy found out later) PRESSURE • Normally: contractors are trying to prove to Hardy (you) they're ready to launch, or their system is safe to fly. ...This time, they were so concerned that they rec. no launch - they were no used to having "are you sure it's safe"...when you said "are sure it's not safe" - they were taken aback. Is it possible you didn't realize impact of your statement.