This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.
1st Telecon w/ Cremins - Participants: (Tom's #'s) Mark Urhan 202.358.1747 Brent (c) 202.615.[[/strikethrough]].6754 [[/strikethrough]] .6672 - Small w/ initial requests (clear?) - coord w/ other subgroups [verify] - cost/schedule of end-of-gap options (Bo's) - detailed data/discussion of workforce of industrial base (Les's) - New needs/use of iss for beyond Leo (Ed's) (i.e. we'll take human phys; they take radiation + any new tech [[?]] work that their architectures may req - coord w/ (Les's) or int'l (we take impl of on ISS, they take lead + on expl) [Tom--> Ralph + Rads; Bo/Les/Ed] 6/22 - mtg w/ sub-group tues evening (develop requests) To get started: [end of wk] 1. study on shuttle extension sent to congress (2012,2015.... 9 May 09) + review those again (better/good ideas) comments? (we'll ask for specific CBES [[?]]– open to suggestions) Aerospace 2. Assessment of ISS life/health to 2020 w/ sts ret [[?]] in 2010, 2012, 2015 [start w/ listing of critical ore's redundacy [[redundancy]] lifetime, etc] (specific cases later in ULA 3. summarize int'l partner agreements on termination [[left margin]] Tom: Mark Maybe Karen Sarstein [[?]] (?) (int'l) Doug Comstock (comm) Chris Ferguson Don Pettit Exp Ctr Dave Bartine [[?]] (Tech/ksc) Dennis... (synthesis, simieg'ig [[?]] @MSFC) Don Cazini (JPL) Valador [[?]] (subj matter experts) [SAIC] 2. Ops lifetime promised (official, unofficial) 3. Existing okans for Jim + columbus 4. lifetime [[left margin]] capabilities not util.
Transcription Notes:
there were a couple of things I couldn't quite make out. Can someone review my guesses?