![Transcription Center logo](/themes/custom/tc_theme/assets/image/logo.png)
This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.
=> Nothing using Orion can fly before ~9/2017 (3/15 + 18 mo slip + 12 yr design cycle) Can save .5-1.5 yrs & $3B-$9B over Aerospace est of CX IOC by replacing Ares 1 w/ Delta IV H - Send ISS scenarios → Matt ✰ Aerospace can help w/budgets for scenario options ✰ Orion not ready until ~9/2016 (then add 1 yr for/if another rocket) NASA could recompete ET {if STS extended or sidemount} LM could do it cheaper JSC USA bridge contract STS/ISS → CX, compete is [[complete in/is?]] FY11 KSC different: no bridge competing [[strikethrough]]now[[/strikethrough]] soon <=> KSC could do same thing
Transcription Notes:
im not sure if it keeps saying "STS" or "SB"
I think it's STS because throughout the other papers the STS is mentioned
IS it FY11 or FYII?
At bottom of page, for JSC/KSC section - could both (or either) be competes or completes? E.g. "Completing soon..."