Viewing page 38 of 61

This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.

ISS
SOME CONSERVATISM IN DESIGN LIFE of STRUCTURE + ORU'S[?]
CMG'S (SOME RE-DESIGN) + REMOTE PWR CNTLRS [CONTROLLERS] (FAILURE)
MEANT BETW [BETWEEN] FAILURES < EXPECTED
([underlined]BUT[/underlined] NOT AS MUCH WEAR/LIFE)

--> [underlined]TO UTILIZE[/underlined] => UPMISS [?] ASSUMPTIONS?

$2-2.5B for basic ops

Scenario 1     ATV 5 --> COULD BE USED?
D/O => 3 MO (all costs captured)
NO CLEAR COSTS FOR MOTHBALLING (+NOT RECOMMENDED)
(NOTE: MAY TAKE >3 CREW TO MAINTAIN DISCUSSION)

TECHNICALLY UNACHIEVABLE FOR PARTNERS TO TAKE OVER + HAVING (e.g.) USA OPERATE IT => COST PROHIBITIVE

(IF EXTEND, EXTEND "ALL THE WAY" => 2025)

(IF D/O => WON'T HAVE CAPABILITY TO STAY IN ORBIT FOR LONG TIMES)

SCENARIO 2
OPS COSTS => 40% STAFFING REDUCTION PLANNED
(1)COST TO EXTEND -- (29B-13.7B)~15B
(2)COST TO EXTEND + FULLY UTILIZE -- $2.9B (-->2020)
(~3 MT/YR THRU PUT CAPACITY -- UNUSED)
[star] NAT'L LAB AGREEMENTS LIKELY TO WITHER IN 18 MO IF ISS CNX