![Transcription Center logo](/themes/custom/tc_theme/assets/image/logo.png)
This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.
ISS SOME CONSERVATISM IN DESIGN LIFE of STRUCTURE + ORU'S[?] CMG'S (SOME RE-DESIGN) + REMOTE PWR CNTLRS [CONTROLLERS] (FAILURE) MEANT BETW [BETWEEN] FAILURES < EXPECTED ([underlined]BUT[/underlined] NOT AS MUCH WEAR/LIFE) --> [underlined]TO UTILIZE[/underlined] => UPMISS [?] ASSUMPTIONS? $2-2.5B for basic ops Scenario 1 ATV 5 --> COULD BE USED? D/O => 3 MO (all costs captured) NO CLEAR COSTS FOR MOTHBALLING (+NOT RECOMMENDED) (NOTE: MAY TAKE >3 CREW TO MAINTAIN DISCUSSION) TECHNICALLY UNACHIEVABLE FOR PARTNERS TO TAKE OVER + HAVING (e.g.) USA OPERATE IT => COST PROHIBITIVE (IF EXTEND, EXTEND "ALL THE WAY" => 2025) (IF D/O => WON'T HAVE CAPABILITY TO STAY IN ORBIT FOR LONG TIMES) SCENARIO 2 OPS COSTS => 40% STAFFING REDUCTION PLANNED (1)COST TO EXTEND -- (29B-13.7B)~15B (2)COST TO EXTEND + FULLY UTILIZE -- $2.9B (-->2020) (~3 MT/YR THRU PUT CAPACITY -- UNUSED) [star] NAT'L LAB AGREEMENTS LIKELY TO WITHER IN 18 MO IF ISS CNX