This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.
(STS EXT) + (ISS) + (SIDEMOUNT) (STS + 1) + (ISS) + (D IV H + ORION) + ATV'S or PROCESS (STS) + [ATV'S [PROGRESS' -> HOW CAN ISS SUPPORT EXPLORATION? [PULL THIS TOGETHER....] RADZ: •INTEGRATED COST of SHUTTLE (->MAR 2011) +CX(2017)(with focus on capturing all carrying costs only once => and identifying them) +ISS EXT (& identifying carrying costs) BOOK-KEEP (SHOW) AS XFERRING ALL CARRYING COSTS PLANNED -> CX in 2010 AS PLANNED (i.e. WHAT'S Δ for SHUTTLE) CXSRT[[?]]: STS CARRYING COSTS WHAT FRACTION CX AGREES TO PICK UP, WHICH THEY DON'T •SAME CASE for 2 STS SCENARIOS [[written next to text]]AEROSPACE=> [[/written next to text]]COSTED BY SHANNON (are we double counting) Xfer costs over to CX (1) ISS de-commission (quick look) [[right margin]]-LIKELY COST of PGM of RECORD (incl ↑for ISS D/O) -HOW TO FIT IT INTO BUDGET PROFILE? (SLIP CX) -HOW TO FIT STS + ISS + CX INTO PROFILE (TOO MUCH) DOING ALL 3 BADLY
Transcription Notes:
often uses x to = "trans," as in xferring, xfer.
I corrected transcription to read "XFERRING" and "XFER", which is what was actually written in the notebook.