Viewing page 46 of 61

This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.

(STS EXT) + (ISS) + (SIDEMOUNT)

(STS + 1) + (ISS) + (D IV H + ORION)
              + ATV'S
                or PROCESS
(STS) + [ATV'S
        [PROGRESS'

-> HOW CAN ISS SUPPORT EXPLORATION?
    [PULL THIS TOGETHER....]

RADZ:
  •INTEGRATED COST of SHUTTLE (->MAR 2011)
                     +CX(2017)(with focus on capturing all carrying costs only once => and identifying them)
                     +ISS EXT (& identifying carrying costs)

       BOOK-KEEP
       (SHOW) AS XFERRING 
        ALL CARRYING COSTS
        PLANNED -> CX in
        2010 AS PLANNED
        (i.e. WHAT'S Δ
         for SHUTTLE)
                     CXSRT[[?]]: STS CARRYING COSTS                               WHAT FRACTION CX AGREES TO PICK UP, WHICH THEY DON'T
 •SAME CASE for 2 STS SCENARIOS
[[written next to text]]AEROSPACE=>  [[/written next to text]]COSTED BY SHANNON 

(are we double counting) Xfer costs over to CX

 (1) ISS de-commission (quick look)
                                                                        
[[right margin]]-LIKELY COST of PGM of RECORD (incl ↑for ISS D/O)
-HOW TO FIT IT INTO
 BUDGET PROFILE? 
(SLIP CX)
-HOW TO FIT STS + ISS + CX
 INTO PROFILE
(TOO MUCH)
 DOING ALL 3 BADLY

Transcription Notes:
often uses x to = "trans," as in xferring, xfer. I corrected transcription to read "XFERRING" and "XFER", which is what was actually written in the notebook.