Viewing page 81 of 125

This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.

WOMEN UNDER-REP IN Sci/TECH (11%/20%)
COLLEGES..... H.S. => Easier [[?]]
BUT -> ELEMENTARY SCHOOL...
4th GR => 68%/66%
THEN IN ~5th-8th,   LOSE THEM
NOT APTITUDE
NOT INTEREST
REASONS SOCEITAL => SUBTLE MESSAGES
                    IMPORTANT TO BE COOL EE Example
                     STEREOTYPES => EINSTIEN
                INTRANALIZE -> DRIFT AWAY
             SUBTLE: MATH/MOM
                  "I CAN, BUT I DON'T WANT TO"
    DON'T NEED TO CONVERT => PGMS TO SUPPORT,SUSTAIN THEIR INREST
                    •SHOW OTHER GIRLS
                     ("NETWORK" + COLLAB)
                    •INTRO TO ROLE MODELS -> FEMALE FACE
-> SOME OF ISSUES MIGHT SOUND FAMILIAR-> CULTURE
SOCIETAL STRUCTURE
SOCIAL EXPECTATIONS
DELOITR[[?]] WIN [[Circled]]
ISSUES NOT CONFINED TO ->YOUNG GIRLS
                       ->SCIENCE/TECH
<- PHIL. BEHIND STS CREAR PGMS... LIKE SCI FESTIVALS; BOOKS (INCL WOMEN) [HOPE?]
NAS->HIGH LEVEL PANEL (2007)->WHY ARE THERE SO FEW WOMEN ON COLLEGE/UNIV. FACULTIES?
KEY FINDINGS: NOT JUST PIPELINE     
            IDENTIFIED "IMPLICIT BIAS"        
            =>WOMEN FACE ACCUM OF DISADVANTAGE
              (CREATES "BUILT IN HEADWIND")
                                           ->