![Transcription Center logo](/themes/custom/tc_theme/assets/image/logo.png)
This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.
82 Program proposed: must be deduced mainly from budget, since no rencand [[?]] operationil a. Batu pultik cutters apparently get equipment b. gamping producers get 2 new ovens, which will use 31 workers each, as follows: 4 tenaga baka (firers) 4 tenaga pembantu (helpers) 6 masons (("to make & tear down" = "memuat + bongkar [[?]]" - ? not clean)) 3 women to pack in plastic bago 15 stone collectors = pengumpul batu 31 new ovens use polar-cost ovens 300,000 each & 1 [[strike]] 2 [[/strike]] tangki minyak baka @ 150,000 provided to each oven c. apparently furniture produces & get mainly diklat d. apparently pmiths get equipment for 6 new perapens, some [[strike]] enter [[/strike]] type of intermed. technology, some raw material as sistance (thru "sistem feeder point" - also possibly diklat & marketing assistance which will enable them to bypass tengkulaks ("mencegah sistem tengkulaks") [[left margin]] total budget 12,000,000, of which 4M to be used 1st yr [[year]] [[/left margin]] [[circled]]83[[/circled]] budget break-down for 1st yr only: survey: 80,000 Rp gaji dan upah: 380,000 (9 1/2 %) feeder point: 2,400,000 (60%) diklat: 600,000 "operasionil": 540,000 (not explained) feeder point item breaks down to 1M for raw mat & 1.4M for peralatan & mesin my comments: 1. wherever a plan to give equipment should be stated in DIP type of equipment to be given - mentions will given teknologi tepat guna: are there any criteria for evaluating whether a particular piece of equipment is tepat guna or not? possible criteria- 1. does not damage environment &/or reduces present damage 2. does not cause unemployment 3. increases savings or has some other positive benefit 4. can be imitated 5. is avail. from local founduis [[?]] or workshops, or can be made by producers themselves from local materials