Viewing page 36 of 64

This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.

56

[[upper right margin]]
zero sum gene (IFS
gain you lose - would a fixed pie)

of these roles

as system [[strikethrough]] beca [[/strikethrough]] becomes bigger less involtute - if I walk into restaurant in NY + order coffee, my only relation to waiter is customer-client; waiter can't say, "If you don't pay for this coffee I won't help you build your canoo next mo."
perception of joint benefit declines + becomes more of a zero same game (If I leave w/ out paying for coffee, I gain 50 cents + you lose 50 cents)

ultimately not, since cafe may go broke + I can't drink coffee there

non-zero sum game is I am not seeking maximum short-term profit + willing to take less for long-term relationship
thus, acc. to Alice, still maximizing, but taking the longer view
(hence a criticism of substantivists who say not maximizing)

Alice sees that moral rules are a kind of maximizing - do unto other as you would have them do unto you brings long-term benefits

57

to play a non-zero sum game is very short-sighted in a small society

probably higher [[strikethrough]] in [[/strikethrough]] tolerance for imbalance in [[strikethrough]] embedded  [[/strikethrough]] involuted relations
will stick w/ a bad marriage longer than would stick w/ a bad job