![Transcription Center logo](/themes/custom/tc_theme/assets/image/logo.png)
This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.
58 [[left margin]] 3/11 -[[/left margin]] Economizing & Maximizing really same thing Fosters "Image of Limited Good" Peasants in Mexico assume that if [[?]] gets rich must come out of other peoples pockets in this case were some constraints, esp land but Alice feels that many peasants aware if we all cooperate ie irrigation we will all get benefits & be better off village gets in trouble if resources start flowing out of the village ((how does this tie in w/ levelling mechanisms?)) risk differs from uncertainty [[strikethrough]] un[[/strikethrough]] in unpredictability, tho nowdays tendency to perceive as continuum one of the convenient things about having wealthy villages around is that they can afford to take risks [[left margin]] Bob Jay's data [/left margin]] you can [[strikethrough]] [[?]] [[/strikethrough]] get a sharecropping arrangement from him young inexperienced worker gets diff. 59 arrangement & has to bear less risk than middle aged sharecropper who is more experienced & landowner turns it totally over to him in terms of decision - making in earlier period of Java owed labor, not cash when in debt zero sum non-zero sum land market land improvem div of irrig. water repair irr. works so less loss for soaking in if selling outside the village, if market elastic would perceive as non-zero sum game + if market ineleastic as zero sum game if perceive as non-zero sum will not compete as intensively as if perceive as zero sum non zero sum has survival value