![Transcription Center logo](/themes/custom/tc_theme/assets/image/logo.png)
This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.
100 Ortiz shows, however, reciprocity can be combined w/ pooling among Paez Sahlins says only w/ reciprocity can do such things as store food supplies against risk- Ortiz says can do by pooling 101 5/6- Sahlins (contd) pooling is more egalitarian, less stratified than redistrib. coalition doesn't hold things in common as in pooling, but otherwise similar if wealthy enough not to need the long term benefits of coalition can move out Bob Jay pts out that if I have 1/10 of a ha & you have 10ha, silly for us to do gotong royong also a desire at both ends ([[strikethrough]] ha [[/strikethrough]] of Jav village spectrum) to move into cash economy- wealthier farmers would rather do cash cropping [[image - sketches of two circles with many swirls within]] [[image - sketch of 5 vertical lines with diagonal lines intersecting them]] on "pure gift" the reward may be intrinsic, ie the pleasure of a child's enjoyment Sahlins extends meaning of substantivist's term reciprocity Alice criticizes Sahlins for including theft under reciprocity- theft not embedded & can be done by an animal,