This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.
Mr.James Meals - 2 - April 15, 1968 Re: Paragraph 1, Page 3: ___________________________ I believe at the time of this meeting, Mr. Madole had already been retained for the purpose of handling Mike Gett's petition. The motion was to use Mr. Levy to supplement Mr. Madole because his prior experience with the Age 60 problem, and because of Mr. Madole's present workload. It is my understanding that Mr. Madole is the Chief Legal Advisor to the Committee insofar as this action is concerned. It is my further understanding that this has the unanimous approval of the Committee. Re: Paragraph 3, Page 3: ______________________________ I believe that the minutes should indicate that the petition present by Mr. Madole and Mr. Levy was approved by a majority of the Committee. I do not believe it should be suggested that this was a unanimous decision. I certainly have no objection to being identified as the dissenter if this is considered desirable. My recollection is that the Committee did not assume it had been given authority by the Executive Committee to expend up to $25,000 of Association funds. My understanding was that Chairman Goes and G. Muirheld who, of course, are members of the Executive Committee would take it up with that Committee. I am certain we were aware of the final "be it further resolved" of the Executive Committee Resolution which created the Age 60 Committee and stated that it "shall coordinate their activities with the President of the Association to maintain financial control". Re: Paragraph 5, Page 3: ____________________________ I am not clear which petition is referred to but assume it is the original petition as it is the one approved at this meeting. Sincerely yours, Harry W. Orlady HWO/jp cc: Age 60 Committee C.H. Ruby D. Madole H. Levy