![Transcription Center logo](/themes/custom/tc_theme/assets/image/logo.png)
This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.
support from the middle class, but from the working class. So this was the confusion. They didn't understand a new movement in Latin America. JD: [CAN JAIME MAKE A FINAL COMMENT ABOUT THIS DISCUSSION?] ending with the beginning of the discussion about Evita Evita, in my opinion simbolizes the struggles of the poor in[[strikethrough]] LA and [[/strikethrough]] the emerging countries of the contradictions [[strikethrough]] of [[/strikethrough]] between the [[strikethrough]] elite [[/strikethrough]] corporate culture and the need of the masses. [[strikethrough]] the legacy of Evita is still being debated in Argentina. [[/strikethrough]] Evita was probably one of first political figures in the world to use television as a tool to spend a particular 'frame of mind" [[strikethrough]] I Hope [[/strikethrough]] this discussion [[strikethrough]] will [[/strikethrough]] opens the channel of communication of these fouls. [[strikethrough]] We can see these few still working in LA today [[/strikethrough]] Neither the corporate America or communist system addresses the issue of the [[hand drawn arrow pointing to the the beginning of "discussion"]] evita: to avoid, ellude, to spare 8 Evita: to avoid, elide, to spare 8