Viewing page 22 of 40
This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.
Copy November 3, 1953 48 Cooper Square, New York City 3 Dear Betty Parsons: After the amenities of last evening I feel it only fair to both of us to set down my reaction to your proposal concerning Life Magazine. It is simply and sincerely an absolute NO. I think it would serve little purpose at this time to state my reasons for this rejection. If they are not already known it is due to causes other than silence on my part. But I would like to add that the manner in which the Luce publications would handle the work is not the only reason for my rejection. I sincerely abhor this kind of exploitation of my work from all points of consideration. For those in your gallery who need the kind of propaganda such promotion provides I would be the last to interfere with their desires. But as for me the whole direction of this sort of thing is quite contrary to the values to which I am dedicated, and the purposes toward which I work. Past experiences, both of other men and myself, in Life and other publications, leave me no alternative. I can not give my consent to any part of such an activity. Most sincerely, Clyfford Still C. Still P.S. The above refers to a request by B. Parsons to permit my paintings to be used in an article in Life Mag. dealing with the Parsons Gallery and promoted by her, B. Newman, and A. Reinhardt to publicize their work and the gallery. Having nothing in common with any of the three nor any others in her gallery I deplored the suggestion. B.P. owns paintings of mine which she was permitted to purchase on conditions that they be not used in her gallery promotion, group shows, or other ulterior schemes. I therefore consider the present proposal insidious, devious, and without commitment to the integrity of the work or its issues. It should be added that I have not been for over two years a member of her gallery. The reasons are implicit in this, her request, and its purpose and motives. C.S.
