![Transcription Center logo](/themes/custom/tc_theme/assets/image/logo.png)
This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.
2 Logger's sheet Logger: Becky Gilmore / Lita Aldridge Reel Number: 1B Stage: Trial Lawyers Date: July 6, 1987 Presentor: G. Ingram - Phila. Group Name: Closing Argument (Damages) Freeman vs. [[strikethrough]] [[?]] [[/strikethrough]] Amerifund Toy Co Region/Style: Performer(s) Instrument/Occupation Germaine Ingram Phila, PA Jacob Stein - [[strikethrough]] Def [[/strikethrough]] Plaintiff Washington, DC Keith Roberts - Defense Illinois Jim Carrigan - Judge Denver, CO Contents 1. Ingram: background of case - [[srikethrough]] Wa [[/strikethrough]]] will be 2. deciding amount of damages to be paid if decided 3. in favor of plaintiff. 4. Plaintiff-tactics used in closing statement. 5. Closing Statement from Plaintiff - summarized points of case talked about educational needs, emotional needs 6. Defense - tactics used - 1) explain why the talks about damages 7. 2) demonstrate how exaggerated money demands are 8. 3) "causal connection" 4) end on note that defendant 9. doesn't really owe any thing 10. Defense- closing statement- pointed out that other people have same symptoms as scotty w/out having 11. swallowed a marble: summarized testimony of 3 12. doctors who testified at trial 13. Plaintiff - Rebuttal - talked about Dr Carter who was paid by Amerifund - tries to put testimony in different light. Talked [[strikethrough]] or [[/strikethrough]] about "Marble Month" as a learning toy. 14. Ingram: Questions - Disc. - Why not ask for punitive damages/disc. seeking fair verdict [end of tape (over - other side.
Transcription Notes:
Places marked with [[?]] I am unable to translate