Viewing page 93 of 97

This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.

(6) 
LOGGER'S SHEET

Logger: Becky Gilmore / Lita Aldridge
Reel Number: 3B 
Stage: Trial Lawyers
Date: 7/6/86 
Presentor: Germaine Ingram
Group Name: Direct and Cross Exam (Freeman)
Region/Style: Civil Case

Performer(s) Instrument/Occupation
Jacob Stein - Plaintiff Washington, DC
Keith Roberts - Defense Wheaton, IL
Barry Scheck - Judge New York City, NY

Contents:
1. Ingram- background of case
2. Plaintiff- what he hopes to achieve in questioning the
3. witness (Mrs. Freeman)- would want jury to feel good about mother.  
4. Plaintiff- direct exam of witness
5. [[strikethrough]] Ingram [[/strikethrough]]/ Roberts: Cross-exam tactics a) will use great care, delicate touch; b) will try to get facts that game didn't cause problems; c) mother had same respon. that day
[[strikethrough]]6[[/strikethough]]
6.[[strikethrough]]7.[[/strikethrough]]Roberts: Cross exam
7.[[strikethrough]]8.[[/strikethrough]] Stein: asks Judge to instruct Jury re: line of questioning of mother's alternatives
[[strikethrough]]9.[[/strikethrough]]
10[[strikethrough]]10.[[/strikethrough]] Ingram/Stein: If had opp to redirect, would go back to game; child alert & imitative. 
11. Roberts: trying to be kind & helpful so jury would not feel he was [[strikethrough]] tha [[/strikethrough]] tough on mother. 
12[[strikethrough]]12.[[/strikethrough]] Ingram: When do you not cross-exam?
[[strikethrough]]13.[[/strikethrough]] Roberts: When can't make real important points & has no damaged you. 

Over-Other side-