![Transcription Center logo](/themes/custom/tc_theme/assets/image/logo.png)
This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.
(6) LOGGER'S SHEET Logger: Becky Gilmore / Lita Aldridge Reel Number: 3B Stage: Trial Lawyers Date: 7/6/86 Presentor: Germaine Ingram Group Name: Direct and Cross Exam (Freeman) Region/Style: Civil Case Performer(s) Instrument/Occupation Jacob Stein - Plaintiff Washington, DC Keith Roberts - Defense Wheaton, IL Barry Scheck - Judge New York City, NY Contents: 1. Ingram- background of case 2. Plaintiff- what he hopes to achieve in questioning the 3. witness (Mrs. Freeman)- would want jury to feel good about mother. 4. Plaintiff- direct exam of witness 5. [[strikethrough]] Ingram [[/strikethrough]]/ Roberts: Cross-exam tactics a) will use great care, delicate touch; b) will try to get facts that game didn't cause problems; c) mother had same respon. that day [[strikethrough]]6[[/strikethough]] 6.[[strikethrough]]7.[[/strikethrough]]Roberts: Cross exam 7.[[strikethrough]]8.[[/strikethrough]] Stein: asks Judge to instruct Jury re: line of questioning of mother's alternatives [[strikethrough]]9.[[/strikethrough]] 10[[strikethrough]]10.[[/strikethrough]] Ingram/Stein: If had opp to redirect, would go back to game; child alert & imitative. 11. Roberts: trying to be kind & helpful so jury would not feel he was [[strikethrough]] tha [[/strikethrough]] tough on mother. 12[[strikethrough]]12.[[/strikethrough]] Ingram: When do you not cross-exam? [[strikethrough]]13.[[/strikethrough]] Roberts: When can't make real important points & has no damaged you. Over-Other side-