Viewing page 7 of 15

This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.

As a reporter of the entire situation, he is unwilling, even incapable - and probably superficial. Of course, Jack may have had to observe a deadline much too soon. As scholar, the man seems incessantly about contradicting his ill-informed, poorly researched interpretations of my supposed intentions, for art. Jack is most confused. Some of his article's errors of fact could have been prevented if he would have merely consulted the exposition catalogue. Otherwise in doubt, he should have asked Brydon Smith for help - or even me. To speculate the way Burnham did in his customary contradictory fashion about how the catalogue was formed and eventually institutionally thwarted is relatively none of his affair for publication and much more false than not. (I could explain more fully but why bother.) What went wrong with one, only one, of the two Galleria Sperone expositions is deliberately documented in the catalogue at Brydon's request. Can't Jack even read well enough. That you permitted Jack to jerk out abusing my writing in part through an abruptly terminated fractured quote out of context is familiar to me and typical of your editorial irresponsibility. (Man, after the Friedian Manet fiasco, you should have quite appropriately disappeared - resigned along with the Letters to the editor column. Oh, I'll bet that several scholars and others, not only

2