![Transcription Center logo](/themes/custom/tc_theme/assets/image/logo.png)
This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.
Copy The Wallace Collection Manchester Square London W 1 27th October 1959 Dear Mr. Seligman, I was sorry you did not come to London at the end of your summer vacation, as it would have been pleasant to have renewed our acquaintance once again. I am most intrigued with what you tell me about the statue by Lemoyne described as representing Madame de Pompadour and dated 1744, which was at Bagatelle. There is a bust of Madame de Pompadour by therefore there is some mistake in the transcription of the date, they cannot be identical. It occurs to me, however, that the statue in question may have been Pigalle's allegorical figure of "L'Amitie" where friendship was shown under the guise of Madame de Pompadour. This was certainly in Lord Hertford's possession at Bagatelle. Later it went to Baron Edmond de Rothschild at Ferrieres, and now I imagine belongs to Baron Maurice's heir. This piece of sculpture is life size and is signed and date 1753. There is no recorded Lamoyne of her as early as 1744, which was when her liason with Louis IV was just beginning. I am also interested in what you have to say about our Bouchers. Certainly some of them came from Madame de Pompadour, notably the two huge pictures of the Rising and the Setting of the Sun, which you will remember hanging on the Grant Staircase here. What I should like to find is evidence that the four smaller allegorical pictures representing various episodes in the life of Venus (they are Nos. 429,432,438 and 444 in the Wallace Collection Picture Catalogue) really belonged to Madame de Pompadour also. Traditionally they are said to have come from her boudoir at the Hotel de l'Arsenal, but the evidence for this seems very shaky indeed, and goes back no further than the middle of the XIXth century. In addition, I have been unable to find any evidence that she ever had any appartements at the Arsenal. If you can find anything in your wonderful inventory which casts light on this question I should be most grateful to hear it. Of course our portrait of Madame de Pompadour (Ct.No. 418) also belonged to the sitter, and there is a possibility that one of our over-doors, the Muse Clio (Cat. No. 40x 490) was here as well, thought there is some difficulty in reconciling the sizes mentioned on the engraved picture with those of the picture as it exists today. Unfortunately I was in New York on such a short visit on my return from Pittsburgh that I was unable to see the Birth and Triumph of Venus at the Metropolitan Museum. I made enquiries with this end in view, but it would have taken some time to make the picture accessible, as it is a large one. Ihad regretfully to leave without seeing it. However I will be [[right margin]] Watson Wallace Collection [[/right margin]]