![Transcription Center logo](/themes/custom/tc_theme/assets/image/logo.png)
This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.
2 Elizabeth Johnson (Co'd) } vs. } John Armstead } Claim for services rendered the past year. It appearing that Plaintiffs claim was just the Court ordered Deft should pay said Elizabeth Johnson the sum of Twenty-four dollars. Elsa White (Co'd) } vs } John Armstead } Acion for recovery of wages for services rendered. It appearing from the evidence adduced that Deft. was in indebted to Plaintiff in the sum of Twenty dollars, which the Court ordered to be paid said Elsa White. Harry Dixon (Co'd) } vs } Fanny E. Roy } Claim for wages for last years services. It appearing from Plaintiffs infirmities and old age that food and clothes, were a fair compensation for his services, which he had already received, and the ordered the said Harry had no further claim on Mrs. Roy. March 10th 1866 Emily Thompkins (Co'd) } vs. } Richard Steward } Action for recovery of clothing due Plaintiff. It appearing that certain articles of clothing were due Plaintiff in payment for last years services the Court ordered Deft to pay said Emily the sum of Three dollars ($3.00)
Transcription Notes:
----------
Reopened for Editing 2024-05-18 13:41:29
NARA microfilm numbers for this project have four digits, and the last digit on this page is illegible, so it is transcribed as 319[[?]].
----------
Reopened for Editing 2024-05-28 18:49:09