Viewing page 269 of 504

This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.

[78] 
diverges more; and the white crystal or flint English glass, as it is called, most of all. 
It was not now my business to examine into the particular qualities of every kind of glass that I could come at, much less to amuse myself with conjectures about the cause, but to fix upon such two sorts as their difference was the greatest; which I soon found to be the crown, and the the white flint or crystal.  I therefore ground a wedge of white flint of about 25 degrees, and another of crown of about 29 degrees, which refracted nearly alike; but their divergency of the colours was very different.  I then ground several others of crown to different angles, till I got one, which was equal, with respect to the divergency of the light, to that in the white flint: for when they were put together, so as to refract in contrary directions, the refracted light was intirely free from colour. Then measuring the refractions of each wedge, I found that of the white glass to be that of the crown nearly as 2 to 3; and this proportion would hold very near in all small angles. Wherefore any two wedges made in this proportion, and applied together, so as to refract in contrary directions, would refract the light without any difference of refrangibility. 
To make therefore two spherical glasses, that should refract the light in contrary directions, it is easy to understand, that one must be concave, and the other convex; and as the rays are to converge to a real focus, the excess of refraction must evidently be in the convex, and as the convex is to refract most, it appears from the experiment that it must be made with crown glass, and the concave with white flint glass. 
And further, as the refractions of spherical glasses are in an inverse ratio of their focal distances; it follows, that the focal distances of the two glasses should be inversely as the ratio's of the refractions of the wedges: for being thus proportioned, every ray of light, that passes thro' this combined glass, at whatever distance if may pass thro' its axe [[?]], will constantly be refracted, by the difference between [[the strikethrough]] two contrary refractions, in the proportion required; and therefore the different refrangibility of the light will be intirely removed. 
Having thus got rid of the principal cause of the imperfections of refracting telescopes, there seemed to be nothing more to do, but to go to work upon this principle: but I had not made many attempts, before I found, that the removal of one impediment had introduced another equally detrimental (the same as I had before found in two glasses with water between them): for the two glasses, that were to be combined together, were the segments of very deep spheres; and therefore the aberrations from the spherical surfaces became very considerable, and greatly disturbed the distinctness of the image. Tho' this appeared at first a very great difficulty, yet I was not long without