Viewing page 15 of 77

This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.

24
[[annotation in red in top margin]] Merger [[/annotation]]
more 1921 will have been a poor year to all of us.
To which [[strikethrough]] the [[/strikethrough]] Karpen and Kirk Brown both object and say 1921 was a normal year with them and insist so much that they give us the impression as if 1921 had given a special source of Revenue to Redmanol.
Schleussner is quick to grasp and says: "If in 1921 which has been a bad year for all industries, Redmanol is able to make good earnings then it is our interest to be let in and have them as partners".
So we let 1921 in. [[strikethrough]] I pe [[/strikethrough]] We fight hard for 1916 but Redmanol urge they were not yet equipped then and
[[end page]]
[[start page]]
25
[[annotation in red in top margin]] Merger [[/annotation]]
we furthermore have a cash compensation of $75000, so we should not ask any other handicap.
We preceive ^[[perceive]] the possibility of counting the good will too high proportionately to the physical assets and thus dwarf our [[strikethrough]] info [[/strikethrough]] preponderance in the latter 
Karpen offers to subscribe enough cash to make our assets 50-50, which of course we refuse.
We ask that in calculating good will a restriction should be put that in no case the [[strikethrough]] good [[/strikethrough]] good will of any of us should exceed 75% of tangible assets, and if any of us gets beyond 75% then the formula should be modified by adopting a greater divider until all of

Transcription Notes:
Previous page ends with further-