Viewing page 3 of 65

[[blank Page]]
[[end page]]
[[start Page]]
[[entry in left margin in red]]
Continued from Book [[red underline]] 52 [[/red underline]] [[/entry in left margin]] 
June 16 (1933) continued [[red underline]] from booklet [[underline]] 52 [[/underline]] [[/red underline]] 
This evening went to Staatstheater a play called "Der heilige Crispin" (Saint Crispin) who [[strikethrough]] left [[/strikethrough]] an officer in the Roman legion became a shoemaker. [[strikethrough]] Exceedin [[/strikethrough]] Very well played by first class artists before a very well filled house and entirely appreciative audience. - The play was a mixture of wit, philosophy and history and human psychology written by [[strikethrough]] Ernst [[/strikethough]] Ernst, way above the average.
[[underline]] June 17. [[/underline]] Telegram from George asking whether company will take over loan of [[red underline]] Alan Brown from Irving Trust Co, [[/red underline]] cabled back yes provided same [[strikethrough]] security [[/strikethrough]] collateral & same rates of interest as the bank made him, because do not want to be criticised by stockholders.
Sachs tells me about his negotiations with Römler against which we advised. [[red underline]] Romler, [[/red underline]] as I surmised was in need of cash, just as I wrote to George from Florida. [[red underline]] Romler [[/red underline]] is a subsidiary of [[red underline]] Brown Bovery [[/red underline]] which has been losing much money in Europe as well as in America. - [[red underline]] Sachs [[/red underline]] says that while they were negotiating with [[red underline]] Römler [[/red underline]] the latter suddenly concluded that an arrangement with Dynamit Aktien Gesellschaft, which is a subsidiary of I.G. and which already promises the Poloplas patents. It looks now as if Römler has a licence for Polopas and that he gave license to Dynamit Gesellschaft for Ripper patents. Sachs also states that Romler will still discontinue
Please note that the language and terminology used in this collection reflects the context and culture of the time of its creation, and may include culturally sensitive information. As an historical document, its contents may be at odds with contemporary views and terminology. The information within this collection does not reflect the views of the Smithsonian Institution, but is available in its original form to facilitate research. For questions or comments regarding sensitive content, access, and use related to this collection, please contact