Viewing page 77 of 105

Switch to vertical layout Switch to horizontal layout

Go to previous page Return to project home Go to next page

Page #

Go

Download PDF for ECuaP (project ID 7857) Post ECuaP (project ID 7857) to Facebook Tweet ECuaP (project ID 7857)

This transcription has been completed. Contact us with corrections.

Log

Page	Plate	Class	Object	R.A.	Dec	Start	Obs H.A.	Obs Dec	Stop	Exp	Date	Miscellaneous
154	10008		ο Ceti	2 14	-3.4	03 39	1 25 W	-3.4	03 54		Feb 09 1897	x 10008 Reversed.
154	10009		ο Ceti	2 14	-3.4	03 55	1 41 W	-3.4	04 14		Feb 09 1897
154	10010		μ Cephei	0 53	+81.3	04 49	3 56 W	+81.3	06 27		Feb 09 1897	x 10010 Var Star App. Magnet end fused. 1m signals from B 394. 394 7 24 1st movement 8 13 R.A. -1/2 rev. 8 40 Sky 3S 7P. 8 51 Last movement.
154	10011		μ Cephei	0 53	+81.3	06 34	5 38 W	+81.3	07 10		Feb 09 1897	x 10011 Same as last. B 394 8 59 First movement.
154	10012		Ec. Jup. Sat.			07 31	3 04 E	+10.3	07 51		Feb 09 1897	x 10012 Ec. Jupiter Sat. Var. Star App. Magnet end precedes 10s signals from B 394 For comparison's of B&C 1182 & B 312 see I record book No. 16 Page. 185. B&C 1182 954 First movement. 10 14 20 Last movement.
154	10013		Ec. Jup. Sat.			11 57	1 23 W	+10.0	12 26		Feb 09 1897
154	10014		S Cancri	8 38	+19.4	13 36	4 58 W	+19.8	14 09		Feb 09 1897	* Plates do not quite cover region of S Cancri. Wrong R.A. taken. Plate 10014 15 & 16 have centres at about 8h 44m +19.6 & plates 10017 & 18 at 8h 42m +19.4. Was clock probably wrong as noted on preceding page? I think probably that error in R.A. must have been caused, as you infer, by sidereal clock being wrong, as instrument was carefully set on region. Cannot account for difference in Dec. as declination screw was not unclamped after setting for Plate C 10014. W.
154	10015		S Cancri	8 38	+19.4	14 10	5 32 W	+19.8	14 22		Feb 09 1897	* Plates do not quite cover region of S Cancri. Wrong R.A. taken. Plate 10014 15 & 16 have centres at about 8h 44m +19.6 & plates 10017 & 18 at 8h 42m +19.4. Was clock probably wrong as noted on preceding page? I think probably that error in R.A. must have been caused, as you infer, by sidereal clock being wrong, as instrument was carefully set on region. Cannot account for difference in Dec. as declination screw was not unclamped after setting for Plate C 10014. W.
154	10016		S Cancri	8 38	+19.4	14 23	5 45 W	+19.8	14 37		Feb 09 1897	* Plates do not quite cover region of S Cancri. Wrong R.A. taken. Plate 10014 15 & 16 have centres at about 8h 44m +19.6 & plates 10017 & 18 at 8h 42m +19.4. Was clock probably wrong as noted on preceding page? I think probably that error in R.A. must have been caused, as you infer, by sidereal clock being wrong, as instrument was carefully set on region. Cannot account for difference in Dec. as declination screw was not unclamped after setting for Plate C 10014. W.
154	10017		S Cancri	8 38	+19.4	14 38	6 00 W	+19.8	14 57		Feb 09 1897	* Plates do not quite cover region of S Cancri. Wrong R.A. taken. Plate 10014 15 & 16 have centres at about 8h 44m +19.6 & plates 10017 & 18 at 8h 42m +19.4. Was clock probably wrong as noted on preceding page? I think probably that error in R.A. must have been caused, as you infer, by sidereal clock being wrong, as instrument was carefully set on region. Cannot account for difference in Dec. as declination screw was not unclamped after setting for Plate C 10014. W.
154	10018		S Cancri	8 38	+19.4	14 58	6 20 W	+19.8	15 15		Feb 09 1897	* Plates do not quite cover region of S Cancri. Wrong R.A. taken. Plate 10014 15 & 16 have centres at about 8h 44m +19.6 & plates 10017 & 18 at 8h 42m +19.4. Was clock probably wrong as noted on preceding page? I think probably that error in R.A. must have been caused, as you infer, by sidereal clock being wrong, as instrument was carefully set on region. Cannot account for difference in Dec. as declination screw was not unclamped after setting for Plate C 10014. W.